Confirmation (Is It an Extra Ceremony?)
Read-aloud isn't available in this browser.
Why this lesson now: if you are baptized, OCIA typically brings you into full communion at the Easter Vigil, where you are confirmed and receive the Eucharist. You'll want to know what Confirmation is before you receive it, and why many Protestants see it as an extra ceremony.
1. What each side actually claims
The Protestant claim: a believer receives the Holy Spirit at conversion (Ephesians 1:13), and baptism is complete in itself. Confirmation is a later church rite with no New Testament command, and where it exists in Protestant churches it is a profession of faith, not a sacrament.
The Catholic claim: Confirmation is a sacrament that completes baptism. The Holy Spirit is given in a fuller way through anointing with chrism (a blessed oil) and the laying on of hands, strengthening the baptized to live and witness to the faith. In the Latin Church it is normally given by a bishop, who may delegate a priest, as in OCIA.
2. Steelman the objection first
"Scripture says we are sealed with the Holy Spirit when we believe (Ephesians 1:13). Nowhere does Jesus command a second rite after baptism. Acts 8 and Acts 19 describe unusual moments at the start of the Church, not a pattern to repeat. A sacrament that only a bishop can give sounds like adding a layer between a believer and the Spirit."
3. The Catholic response
Start by agreeing that the Spirit is at work in baptism. The question is whether the New Testament also describes a distinct act that follows it. In Acts 8:14-17, Philip baptizes the Samaritans, but the apostles Peter and John come and lay hands on them so that they receive the Holy Spirit. In Acts 19:1-6 Paul baptizes the Ephesians and then lays hands on them, and the Spirit comes. Hebrews 6:2 lists "laying on of hands" among the elementary teachings, and Paul speaks of God anointing and sealing believers (2 Corinthians 1:21-22). On the bishop: the apostles are the ones who lay on hands in Acts 8, which is the root of the bishop as the usual minister. The Eastern Catholic and Orthodox churches give Confirmation (chrismation) right after baptism, even to infants, through a priest, so the Church treats the timing as a matter of discipline. Be honest that Scripture does not give a ritual script, and that the Church developed the details. Early writers such as Tertullian (c. 200) describe an anointing and a laying on of hands after baptism Not yet checked, which shows the practice is old, though you should read the text yourself before citing it.
4. Retrieval practice
What does the Catholic Church say Confirmation does?
Which passage shows the apostles laying hands on baptized Samaritans so they receive the Spirit?
What is the best first move when a Protestant says Confirmation is an extra ceremony?
How do the Eastern Catholic churches show the timing of Confirmation is flexible?
5. Primary source to read next
CCC §1285-1321 on Confirmation, Catholic Answers on Confirmation, and Tertullian, On Baptism (chapters 7-8) for the early practice of anointing and laying on of hands.
For balance: read a Protestant argument that the Spirit is received at faith, and ask your priest or sponsor how your own reception at the Easter Vigil will work.
Stuck, unconvinced, or want to push harder on this? Ask me directly. Tell me whether the objection is about the rite itself or about the bishop.
Saved on this device only. It's included when you export Progress.
Quick reference: Confirmation cheat sheet.